<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why The 2009 Camaro Is Doomed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.motorists.org/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.motorists.org/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/</link>
	<description>News For Drivers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:33:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/comment-page-2/#comment-15475</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/#comment-15475</guid>
		<description>Amazing what a year can do.  So, Eric how were your market predictions??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing what a year can do.  So, Eric how were your market predictions??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim De Young</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/comment-page-2/#comment-15398</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim De Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/#comment-15398</guid>
		<description>So, Mr. Eric Peters:  Tell us, how does your foot taste?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Mr. Eric Peters:  Tell us, how does your foot taste?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HH</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/comment-page-2/#comment-15394</link>
		<dc:creator>HH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/#comment-15394</guid>
		<description>Yes, sir, Eric, you sure hit that nail right on the head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, sir, Eric, you sure hit that nail right on the head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/comment-page-2/#comment-14924</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/#comment-14924</guid>
		<description>I have already seen many new Camaros on the street.  They must be selling well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have already seen many new Camaros on the street.  They must be selling well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ger</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/comment-page-2/#comment-14508</link>
		<dc:creator>Ger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/#comment-14508</guid>
		<description>I get the CAFE compliance, but that is just for vehicles built after 2012. Just imagine if all the people who got older cars were to be fined by the &quot;gas gluzzer&quot; surcharge, people would be pissed. Remember that not anyone can afford a new car this days and so everyone is sticking to our old rusty car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get the CAFE compliance, but that is just for vehicles built after 2012. Just imagine if all the people who got older cars were to be fined by the &#8220;gas gluzzer&#8221; surcharge, people would be pissed. Remember that not anyone can afford a new car this days and so everyone is sticking to our old rusty car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/comment-page-2/#comment-14381</link>
		<dc:creator>a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/#comment-14381</guid>
		<description>funny friggin blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny friggin blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brewtus</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/comment-page-2/#comment-14327</link>
		<dc:creator>Brewtus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/#comment-14327</guid>
		<description>#s matching maros are  afind for sure, especially one containing a gift like you describe yourself...  you should pull up in an &#039;09 for the Dip Stick who wrote this article, make him drool and then tell him how dumb he is.  but thats just me saying that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#s matching maros are  afind for sure, especially one containing a gift like you describe yourself&#8230;  you should pull up in an &#8216;09 for the Dip Stick who wrote this article, make him drool and then tell him how dumb he is.  but thats just me saying that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/comment-page-2/#comment-14299</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 01:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/#comment-14299</guid>
		<description>Brandon,  I was just wondering if you had a point laying around here somewhere?  Considering the topic of this thread whether Nikki is fat or not is niether here nor there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon,  I was just wondering if you had a point laying around here somewhere?  Considering the topic of this thread whether Nikki is fat or not is niether here nor there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/comment-page-2/#comment-14298</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 01:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/#comment-14298</guid>
		<description>Wow, your not conceited at all. Your probally fat though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, your not conceited at all. Your probally fat though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10cenglish</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/comment-page-2/#comment-14093</link>
		<dc:creator>10cenglish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/why-the-2009-camaro-is-doomed/#comment-14093</guid>
		<description>oh man was this guy wrong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh man was this guy wrong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
