Fight Speeding Ticket


National Motorists Association Blog



The Principle Of Vehicle Safety Inspections

Posted on August 29th, 2011 in | 4 Comments

The Principle Of Vehicle Safety Inspections
By Eric Peters, Automotive Columnist

One of the hallmarks of the Clover Mind (that is, of the anti-liberty mind) is acceptance as an article of faith that most people are too dumb to do that which is in their self-interest without the prod of “the law.”

Vehicle safety inspections are a case in point.

Many states require you to waste an hour or more (in some cases a lot more) of your time every year — for every vehicle you own — waiting in line to have the vehicle given a once-over at an Officially Authorized service station. In return for your time (and money) you get an ugly little sticker for the windshield, your permission slip (well, one of them) to continue operating the vehicle.

?The argument, as presented by Clovers, is that most people would never check their brakes, or drive around on bald tires, were it not for these annual safety inspections. In other words, most people (in the Clovers’ worldview) are just too dumb to keep track of such things for themselves. And in a way, they’re right. But not for the reasons they think.

Cloverism breeds Clovers.

That is, the taking away of personal responsibility by “for your own good” laws tends to breed people (Clovers) increasingly incapable of exercising either personal initiative or personal responsibility. Instead, they Wait to be Told What to Do.

And I think that is just what is wanted. Herd-cattle. Compliant, unquestioning.

With regard to vehicle inspections: The average person no longer takes any interest in the functional aspects of his or her car. It has become an appliance — and they’re as likely to pop the hood and check the oil (or notice that the tires are looking ratty) as they are to read up about the role of the Federal Reserve and fiat currency as they relate to our current economic woes.

Let someone else take care of that.

Responsibility is not eliminated — just transferred. Instead of mentally awake people taking responsibility for themselves and their own lives, they surrender both to the Clovers — who know best. This has become so ingrained, so commonplace, that most people aren’t even aware of it anymore. Much less offended by the degradation it implies.

Consider: The mentally awake person who does take responsibility for his life — and thus, for his vehicle’s upkeep — will pay attention to such things as the condition of the tires, the function of the brakes; whether the exhaust note has changed; whether the windshield wipers have begun to streak — and so on. He will notice such things — and take the appropriate action — because it is in his self-interest to do so. Only an idiot — a Clover — would drive a car with worn-out tires or bad brakes (or both).

But because there are so many Clovers out there (more of them all the time, it seems) the mentally awake, responsible car owner who takes good care of his car — because he is mentally awake and responsible and understands that by doing so he is taking care of himself — must nonetheless join the Clover Queue at the gas station, waiting pointlessly (and expensively) in line and going through all the rigmarole in order to get his little sticker confirming that, indeed, he is not a moron.

It’s a cynical — and circular/self-fulfilling — way of viewing the world: People are irresponsible so we’ll “guide” (that is, force) them along the proper path. Which has the effect of making people less and less responsible which in turn requires more and more laws (and more and more force). ?The excellent (if not well-known) film, Idiocracy, showed us how this dynamic ultimate plays out, but we can see it all around us already: The passivity; the servile acceptance; the cow-like instinct to just go-along (and never go it alone).

This is probably the conscious ultimate goal of the uber-Clovers, the ones running the show. Orwell called them the Inner Party; Lenin the Vanguard of the Proletariat. The names don’t really matter. But the ends (and means) do.

Motor vehicle safety inspections may seem like a trivial thing. But the principle at issue is no small thing.

Comments?
www.epautos.com


Not an NMA member yet?   Join today and get these great benefits!

Leave a Comment

4 Responses to “The Principle Of Vehicle Safety Inspections”

  1. Randall1000 says:

    I'm glad here in MD we don't have these inspections unless your selling your car. However we do have pointless VEIP inspections (vehicle emissions) that cost $14 because of the bay. Oh the air pollution, how will the bay survive. You used to have a huge tube put over your exhaust to measure the emissions, now they just hook a computer cord to your car and most things are exempt or N/A. Making it pointless, i understand why they originally started the program but with today's cars, it is just pointless and a waste of time and money. Why is my reputation number so low? I must have pissed off some people somewhere, but i agree and support most of the comments here. I don't understand this stupid rating system.

  2. binderme says:

    I have had this debate with one of my friends in the west that lives in a state that had this inspection at one time but now doesn't. Are there enough idiots saved for what it costs us all to keep them safe by forcing them to keep good tires, to make sure all of their lights work and are pointing the at the correct angle. Is the air made cleaner by making sure everyone has the correct exhaust system for their year and model??????????? Are we all made safer for what it costs every year???? At one time I believed we were, today I'm not as sure……….

    I have been a mechanic for over 35 years at this point and have seen some scary stuff running around the roads in Colorado, a state that did away with it's yearly inspection over ~25 years ago.

  3. GeorgeC_ says:

    End the Fed! It is time for the US to control the issuance of its money/credit, not a bunch of foreign bankers. (the federal reserve is not a public or government bank, it is a private institution)

    The idea of inspection is nonsense. Does the State now assume responsibility?

    and what happens when you know far more than the inspectors?

    • schwinn8 says:

      Agreed – inspections are pointless. I live in MA, where we have them… and near NH where they don't. NH cars aren't any less safe than MA cars… and up here, we see many NH vehicles. Fact is, I see plenty of MA cars spewing smoke, tail lights out, illegal tinted windows, etc… and they have brand new inspection stickers to show for it. In other words, the system is broken, and doesn't actually accomplish anything other than annoying those who have minor issues while at the shop. It boggles my mind that I get harassed because my tires are "near" bald at the wear bars, while I see many cars in the parking lot with completely ruined tires running around with new inspection stickers.

      Unless the system is 100% fair, it's worthless. People need to be held responsible for their own vehicles. I pay attention to mine, why can't everyone else?

      Besides which, the "testing" done here doesn't take into account braking performance in any way. If the brakes wobble, or the shocks are blown, the inspection shop doesn't see this… they only check that the lights work… who cares if the lights work when the car isn't stopping properly?! What's the purpose of this nonsense?

      It's even worse on Motorcycles. I got harassed for having "non DOT" turn signals on my motorcycle (which passed their inspection for 2 years prior to that, at the VERY SAME SHOP). Yet, I see brand new "choppers" rolling around every year, with illegal turn signals and "ape hangers" (which are illegal in this state)… why is it that they get let go when I don't? The reason is simple – the system is broken and unfair… but more importantly, in the end, these missed vehicles are proof that they system doesn't improve safety.




Join National Motorists Association

© National Motorists Association