Short Yellow Light Times No Longer Going Unnoticed

There was an excellent editorial in the Wall Street Journal today on the topic of ticket cameras and short yellow light times.
This is part of an increasing trend in ticket camera press coverage. Two years ago, the press never mentioned short yellow lights as the potential cause for increased accidents at troublesome intersections. Now it is mentioned in nearly every article on ticket cameras.
It’s becoming clear that cities will not be able to get away with this revenue-enhancing trick for much longer.
Here are few excerpts from the Wall Street Journal editorial:
Laid to rest long ago should have been the pretense that the goal is “safety,” not chasing cash. New York State, sinking under budget shortfalls, last week authorized a batch of new red-light cameras around the state. A recent investigation by the Detroit News showed that even conventional ticket-writing is driven by revenue needs. Said one cop: “When you’re being told how many tickets you need to write, to me that’s a quota.”
Consider: Red-light running and speeding, the two main uses of traffic cameras, are implicated in fewer than 8% of accidents. A far more prevalent cause of nondrunken accidents is driver inattention — one study estimated, in a typical case the driver’s eyes are diverted from the road for a full three seconds or more, fidgeting with a cellphone, disciplining the kids in the back seat, snoozing, blotting up spilled coffee, etc.
[...]
Stop-light cameras are especially pernicious. Where red-light running is a problem, the solution is usually a longer yellow — at least three seconds is the recommended minimum for a 25-mph intersection. Drivers do not blast through red lights on purpose. Even the federal government encourages the use of engineering solutions before installing a red-light camera.
Yet as the late and lamented Rocky Mountain News found when Denver was sizing up intersections for cameras a year ago, many of those deemed accident-prone had yellows timed at the state minimum of three seconds or even less. Citizen groups around the country have more than once raised suspicions of authorities shortening yellows to ring up more tickets. Half a dozen Georgia towns just cancelled their camera contracts after a state law mandating the addition of an extra second to the yellow made them unprofitable.
Even defenders of photo enforcement acknowledge studies showing that red-light cameras (which are designed to be conspicuous to motorists) lead to an increase in rear-end collisions as drivers slam on the brakes. Defenders claim the trade-off is still a net gain because of reduced deadly T-bones in the middle of the intersection. But the real lesson may be that both types of accidents would be reduced by a longer yellow.
Read the full article here.
Other Related Articles
- Increased Yellow Light Times Make Ticket Cameras Unnecessary
- 6 Cities That Were Caught Shortening Yellow Light Times For Profit
- 9 Ways To Improve Traffic Safety That The Government Will Ignore Because They Are Too Busy Ticketing You
- Essential Material For Ticket Camera Activists
- Help Us Stop Short Yellow Lights
To change the picture next to your comments, sign up at Gravatar.com. Each picture is associated with a particular email address. (This is a third-party service not affiliated with NMA.)








[...] I was nosing around some more on motorist.org and found this article here: http://www.motorists.org/blog/short-yellow-light-times-no-longer-going-unnoticed, which was written in April 2009. There is also a campaign against short yellow lights (no, [...]
State-minimum yellow times are based on a 25-mph speed limit. A 4-second yellow is still way too short at a 55-mph intersection.
I LIVE IN RAINS COUNTY .THE YELLOW LIGHTS IS BAD HERE.
[...] Read more via Short Yellow Light Times No Longer Going Unnoticed. [...]
Now all we need are studies that say speed cameras are dangerous
Yep. They are.