Fight Speeding Ticket

National Motorists Association Blog

Red-Light Cameras Increase Accidents: 5 Studies That Prove It

Posted on January 8th, 2008 in | 140 Comments

reports The NMA has been contending that red-light cameras (RLCs) are a detriment to motorist safety for many years.

People, both in the media and in the general public, often dismiss this claim as opinion, suggest that there isn’t enough data available yet, ask why we support people who run red lights (we don’t), or write off the organization as being biased.

The only way to combat this is through hard facts and independent research. Luckily, we have both.

We reiterate our challenge: If it’s not about the money, then prove it.

No community has accepted, which shouldn’t be surprising considering the facts.

Here are five independent studies that demonstrate the failure of red-light cameras as a safety measure:

1) A Long Term Study of Red-Light Cameras and Accidents
David Andreassen
Australian Road Research Board
February, 1995

This study examined the long term effect on accident-types of red-light cameras at 41 signalized intersections in Melbourne, Australia. The cameras were installed in 1984, and reported accidents for the period 1979 to 1989 were used in the detailed analysis.

Quotes from the study:

“The results of this study suggest that the installation of the RLC at these sites did not provide any reduction in accidents, rather there has been increases in rear end and adjacent approaches accidents on a before and after basis and also by comparison with the changes in accidents at intersection signals.”

“There has been no demonstrated value of the RLC as an effective countermeasure.”

Download The Full Study

2) The Impact of Red Light Cameras (Photo-Red Enforcement) on Crashes in Virginia
Virginia Transportation Research Council
June 2007

The Virginia Transportation Research Council released a report expanding upon earlier research into the safety effects of red light cameras in Virginia. Despite showing an increase in crashes, this study was instrumental in the return of red-light cameras to the state of Virginia. With a proven negative safety impact, the clear incentive to bring back the cameras was money.

Quotes from the study:

“After cameras were installed, rear-end crashes increased for the entire six-jurisdiction study area… After controlling for time and traffic volume at each intersection, rear-end crash rates increased by an average of 27% for the entire study area.”

“After cameras were installed, total crashes increased.”

“The impact of cameras on injury severity is too close to call.”

“Based only on the study results presented herein and without referencing other studies, the study did not show a definitive safety benefit associated with camera installation with regard to all crash types, all crash severities, and all crash jurisdictions.”

Download The Full Study

3) The Red-Light Running Crisis: Is It Intentional?
Office of the Majority Leader
U.S. House of Representatives
May 2001

This report was prepared by former House Majority Leader Dick Armey’s staff. It looks at the problems of red-light cameras and how to really deal with traffic-light violations.

Quoted from the study:

“And one should ask the question, if there’s a problem with an intersection, why don’t safety engineers in the field just go out and fix the timing?

In fact, before red light cameras arrived in the United States, that’s exactly what our regulations instructed them to do. If too many people enter on red at an intersection, engineers were supposed to lengthen its yellow time. But in the year that red light cameras first started collecting millions in revenue on our shores, those entrusted with developing our traffic safety regulations dropped the requirement to fix signal timing, instructing engineers to “use enforcement” instead.

Indeed, according to the Federal Highway Administration, these problem intersections serve as a great location to hold a press conference. The agency offers a script for local officials to exploit a tragically mistimed intersection to call for the installation of additional red light cameras and tout their safety benefits.

But none of the reports that are supposed to tell us that red light cameras are responsible safety benefits actually say that. First, they dismiss increases in rear-end collisions associated with red light cameras as “non-significant,” despite evidence to the contrary. Second, they do not actually look at red light intersection accidents. The latest accident study in Oxnard, California, for example, only documents accident reductions “associated with”—not caused by— red light cameras. Although that statement has little scientific value, it does have great marketing appeal if you don’t look too closely.

Every study claiming red light cameras increase safety is written by the same man. Before joining the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), he was a top transportation official in New York City at the time the city began looking into becoming the first jurisdiction in the country to install red light cameras. In other words, the father of the red light camera in America is the same individual offering the “objective” testimony that they are effective.

A similar conflict of interest affects those entrusted with writing safety regulations for our traffic lights. The Institute of Transportation Engineers is actively involved in lobbying for, and even drafting legislation to implement, red light cameras. They are closely tied to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), which in turn is funded by companies that stand to profit handsomely any time points are assessed to a driver’s license.

In short, the only documented benefit to red light cameras is to the pocketbook of local governments who use the devices to collect millions in revenue.”

Download The Full Study

4) Investigation Of Crash Risk Reduction Resulting From Red-Light Cameras In Small Urban Areas
Mark Burkey, Ph.D. & Kofi Obeng, Ph.D.
North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University
July 2004

A study prepared by the North Carolina A&T State University’s Urban Transit Institute for the United States Department of Transportation.

Quoted from the study:

“Using a large data set, including 26 months before the introduction of RLCs, we analyze reported accidents occurring near 303 intersections over a 57-month period, for a total of 17,271 observations. Employing maximum likelihood estimation of Poisson regression models, we find that:

The results do not support the view that red light cameras reduce crashes. Instead, we find that RLCs are associated with higher levels of many types and severity categories of crashes.”

Download The Full Study

5) Evaluation of the Red-Light-Camera-Enforcement Pilot Project
Ontario Ministry of Transportation
December 2003

This report from Ontario, Canada’s Ministry of Transportation’s concluded that jurisdictions using photo enforcement experienced an overall increase in property damage and fatal and injury rear-end collisions. The report also concludes that there was an overall reduction in serious accidents and angle collisions. However, a closer look at the data found in this government-sponsored report show that intersections monitored by cameras experienced, overall, a 2 percent increase in fatal and injury collisions compared to a decrease of 12.7 percent in the camera-free intersections that were used as a control group (page 21).

In fact, the non-camera intersections fared better than the camera intersections in every accident category.

Quoted from the study:

“Exhibit 2 indicates the red light running treatments have:

* Contributed to a 4.9 per cent increase in fatal and injury rear-end collisions; and
* Contributed to a 49.9 per cent increase in property damage only rear-end collisions.

The rear-end collision results are similar to findings in other red light camera studies.”

Download The Full Study

This is by no means an exhaustive list. You can find more studies on the NMA website here: Red Light Camera Studies.

Not an NMA member yet?   Join today and get these great benefits!

Leave a Comment

140 Responses to “Red-Light Cameras Increase Accidents: 5 Studies That Prove It”

  1. […] a brief article about red-light cameras with links to several professional studies on the subject. Red-Light Cameras Increase Accidents: 5 Studies That Prove It Originally Posted by spud_meister I don't disagree, but how the hell do you find out how […]

  2. […] documented many times that accidents actually increase at RL Camera equipped intersections (see Red-Light Cameras Increase Accidents: 5 Studies That Prove It ) – Some red light cameras also monitor your speed when the light is green. (this is true, […]

  3. […] Red light cameras still increase accidents. […]

  4. […] is that numerous studies show that such cameras actually increase the number of accidents at these intersections as people […]

  5. […] have shown that red light cameras increase accidents. Lengthening the time of a yellow light actually decreases accidents. Unfortunately, most places […]

  6. […] permalink Red-Light Cameras Increase Accidents: 5 Studies That Prove It […]

  7. […] majority of these studies, serious side impact collisions decreased with the installation of these cameras. These same […]

  8. […] consider that speed cameras and red light cameras actually cause accidents!  Motorists who are aware of these traps slam on the brakes, dramatically […]

  9. […] consequences that concern me. One is that one of the behaviors that may change is one that has been documented in other cities where they have these cameras: increased rear-end collisions as people stop […]

  10. […] camera at the corner of St. Charles and Louisiana has done anything to make motorists safer (which some argue it most certainly has not), we can assume that the only byproduct of its installation has gone […]

  11. […] highway in a non-residential part of the city at 11:30pm can hardly be called excessive speeding. Couple that with the fact that red light camera have nothing to do with justice or keeping the road … it makes a $250 ticket seem down right […]

  12. […] how effective were they anyway? See? It's all just pointless without real facts. How about this? Red-Light Cameras Increase Accidents: 5 Studies That Prove It Sure.. you can also google to find studies that prove the reverse.. The reality is that every […]

  13. […] I just believe in personal responsibility instead of blaming the government for everything Red-Light Cameras Increase Accidents: 5 Studies That Prove It 2007 Virginia DOT Report Shows Red Light Cameras Increase Accidents Rear-end collisions jump at […]

  14. […] The NMA has cited 5 studies which prove that red light cameras increase accidents, read about it here. […]

  15. […] Red Light Cameras – Where are they? Red-Light Cameras Increase Accidents: 5 Studies That Prove It __________________ Ellis Island was sometimes known as "The Island of Tears" or […]

  16. […] Posted by kayfouroh Source? Red-Light Cameras Increase Accidents: 5 Studies That Prove It They site 5 studies. People running red lights and killing people are usually the result of […]

  17. jimpeel says:

    A valuable tool for those of us who gather here would be no-fee POI files of red light and speed cameras for GPS units.

  18. Luke Thomas says:

    The State of Florida is considering legalizing this for the entire state-because it brings in tons of revenue. I for one would consider the State HOSTILE and avoid it once the Governor signs it to law.

  19. […] cameras increase accident rates. Red-light Cameras Increase Crashes, Florida Researchers Find Red-Light Cameras Increase Accidents: 5 Studies That Prove It In Peoria, AZ accidents doubled after red-light cameras were installed. Some members of the city […]

  20. Nick says:

    This study shows a statistically significant decrease in crash costs and severities at locations where RLC are used. The most dangerous type of crash at an intersection is not a rear-end, but an angle crash (turning/t-bone). RLCs reduce these types.

Join National Motorists Association

© National Motorists Association