Making Functional Laws Dysfunctional
By Jim Baxter, NMA President
There are many traffic laws that function reasonably well—as long as they are not strictly enforced. Enforcing “the letter of the law” can make a reasonable regulation unreasonable.
Prior to the passage of the National Maximum Speed Limit in 1974, most speed limits were prima facie, meaning exceeding the limit was cause for an enforcement stop. But, if conditions were such that no one was being endangered, the speed was not unreasonable, and the prosecution could not prove reckless or irresponsible driving behavior, the speeding citation could be dismissed. Of course the reasonableness of prima facie speed limits placed a modest burden on enforcers and prosecutors.
The government’s answer to this burden was the switch to “absolute” speed limits where the elements of reasonability, responsibility, and common sense were removed from the decision process. Exceeding an often arbitrary number became the crime, even if safety was in no way affected. However, absolute speed limits still worked well enough as long as they were not enforced as absolute limits. Adding a five or ten MPH enforcement cushion, over the limit, and backing off on enforcement when traffic was moving smoothly and safely added an element of rationality to an otherwise irrational regulatory system. Of course, giving this much discretion to enforcement agencies was (is) a recipe for discrimination, favoritism, and unequal administration of the law.
With the advent automated photo based enforcement devices the ability to enforce absolute speed limits, to the letter of the law, became feasible. Also, all judgment and discretion, (good and bad) can be removed from the enforcement process. Political considerations are the only constraint that prevents the issuance of citations for exceeding the speed limit by one MPH. Citation revenue can be dialed up or down by changing the enforcement tolerance thresholds. Dial it up to increase the tolerance threshold, and reduce revenue, to reduce political opposition. Dial it down to make more money, but always sensitive to rising opposition that might undermine the entire enterprise.
In the end, almost always, greed wins the day, and arbitrary absolute speed limits will be enforced to the letter of law, to generate the maximum amount of revenue. However, this story can have a happy ending; that is, if the driving public finally recognizes what is being done and demands legitimate speed limits and the end of rapacious photo enforcement.
You deserve every speeding ticket you get. You can complain all you want after the fact, but it's true. Find out why.
It's one of the "great" American past times: complaining about unfair speeding tickets. There are two types of people when it comes to complaining about this particular type of traffic ticket. Which group are you in?
3 dirty tricks that the ticket camera industry uses to steal money from safe drivers. Discover what you don't know.
Despite years of evidence showing that ticket camera companies don't care about safety and will do anything for a buck, there are few tricks that the average driver often fails to notice. You can help expose them.
Right now, I think that just every state has a budget crisis–of the government's own making. I won't get into sides of the aisle, because everyone who draws his paycheck from tax dollars is responsible for creating this situation. And I have no problems naming cities, counties, states, etc. that have screwed up. The driving public deserves to know if they need to bring extra lube where they're going.
As an aside, don't give Chicago Mayor Daley any ideas. Air is the only thing he hasn't taxed yet!
You guys in Illinois have it easy. Vehicle registrations fees have almost TRIPLED in my state. Yes, you read it right: almost tripled it is. You can look to the usual suspects, i.e., those states with budget crisis to figure out which state it is (I do not intend to compromise privacy by mentioning the specific state).
Just as the auto companies went bankrupt because they wanted to reap in profit first and build cars second, the government has also let its proverbial tail wag the dog, by collecting revenue first but only paying lip service to fulfilling its originally intended functions. The only difference is that GM cannot hire armed goons to force you to buy their cars, whereas the government obviously flaunts its ability to collect revenue via forcible means if necessary.
At this rate, in another decade, the government is expected to charge for the air one breathes by forcing one to don a metered mask 24/7 that is linked wirelessly to the nearest cell tower and automatically collect the tax revenue via withholding of one's paycheck.
Welcome to the United Communist States of America!!! We are fast becoming a police state.
our governments only cares about money and not safety. I have got to the point that I don't like driving because of the police and the radar detector ban in Virginia…Lets take our country back!!!!