<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is New Technology Creating Bad Drivers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.motorists.org/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.motorists.org/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/</link>
	<description>News For Drivers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:16:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-10390</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/#comment-10390</guid>
		<description>Jeff the speed of light is 186,000 miles per second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff the speed of light is 186,000 miles per second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-10389</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/#comment-10389</guid>
		<description>Randy &amp; Jeff maybe if the car check his blind spot before moving into the other lane there would have been no accident. 

Some people don&#039;t know how to adjust their mirrors properly, position themselves properly, and most importantly they don&#039;t know how to effectively check their blind spot.

Some people dart right into the lane when they are supposed to change lanes nice a gradually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy &amp; Jeff maybe if the car check his blind spot before moving into the other lane there would have been no accident. </p>
<p>Some people don&#8217;t know how to adjust their mirrors properly, position themselves properly, and most importantly they don&#8217;t know how to effectively check their blind spot.</p>
<p>Some people dart right into the lane when they are supposed to change lanes nice a gradually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-10381</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/#comment-10381</guid>
		<description>What is the speed of light?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the speed of light?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-10380</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/#comment-10380</guid>
		<description>Jeff you are a basket case.  If everyone could just drive fast enough there would not be anyone in front of them or along side of them.  All animals would also be behind them.  I do not know what speed that is though Jeff.  Is it 150 mph or is it the speed of light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff you are a basket case.  If everyone could just drive fast enough there would not be anyone in front of them or along side of them.  All animals would also be behind them.  I do not know what speed that is though Jeff.  Is it 150 mph or is it the speed of light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kira</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-10378</link>
		<dc:creator>Kira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/#comment-10378</guid>
		<description>Hi, there is such thing as blind spot indicators but my car doesn&#039;t have one. I know my mirrors are not adjusted properly. Whats the proper mirror adjustsmet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, there is such thing as blind spot indicators but my car doesn&#8217;t have one. I know my mirrors are not adjusted properly. Whats the proper mirror adjustsmet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-10376</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/#comment-10376</guid>
		<description>How does Randy know what speed they were travelling at?  If the SUV had been driving faster, it would have passed the other vehicle before it changed lanes thus not causing an accident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does Randy know what speed they were travelling at?  If the SUV had been driving faster, it would have passed the other vehicle before it changed lanes thus not causing an accident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-10374</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/#comment-10374</guid>
		<description>Randy you said &quot;As far as that accident we were talking about it more than likely was caused by someone that did not check their blind spot but the speed that they were traveling at caused the car that got bumped into to roll over 8 times. Traveling slower that would not have happened.&quot; You have truth in what you said and I do agree with you. Yes since they were traveling at around at 75 mph that would probably cause the suv rolled over around 8 times if it swerved. Maybe if they were going around 50 mph the suv would have rolled over only 1-2 times and maybe if they went slower the like at 35 mph the suv would not have rolled over. Randy it if it was the car that swerved it probably would not have rolled over like the suv. (POINT 1) It really doesn&#039;t take that much for an suv without stability control to roll over. A video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yr0_UDCRk00&amp;feature=related demonstrates point 1 perfectly. The suv in that video was probably going around 60 mph. (POINT 2) If the suv had stability control it will be harder to roll it over. A video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nss5EUAScag&amp;NR=1 demonstrates point 2 perfectly.

You also said &quot;Everyone here says that speed does not cause any accidents which is false but also when speed is not the cause it makes the accident a lot worse.&quot; Randy speed alone does not kill but speeding too fast for conditions can contribute to the cause of an accident. Speed does make things worse if an accident occurs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy you said &#8220;As far as that accident we were talking about it more than likely was caused by someone that did not check their blind spot but the speed that they were traveling at caused the car that got bumped into to roll over 8 times. Traveling slower that would not have happened.&#8221; You have truth in what you said and I do agree with you. Yes since they were traveling at around at 75 mph that would probably cause the suv rolled over around 8 times if it swerved. Maybe if they were going around 50 mph the suv would have rolled over only 1-2 times and maybe if they went slower the like at 35 mph the suv would not have rolled over. Randy it if it was the car that swerved it probably would not have rolled over like the suv. (POINT 1) It really doesn&#8217;t take that much for an suv without stability control to roll over. A video at <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yr0_UDCRk00&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yr0_UDCRk00&amp;feature=related</a> demonstrates point 1 perfectly. The suv in that video was probably going around 60 mph. (POINT 2) If the suv had stability control it will be harder to roll it over. A video at <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nss5EUAScag&amp;NR=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nss5EUAScag&amp;NR=1</a> demonstrates point 2 perfectly.</p>
<p>You also said &#8220;Everyone here says that speed does not cause any accidents which is false but also when speed is not the cause it makes the accident a lot worse.&#8221; Randy speed alone does not kill but speeding too fast for conditions can contribute to the cause of an accident. Speed does make things worse if an accident occurs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-10373</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 14:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/#comment-10373</guid>
		<description>Todd I either saw that video before or something very close to it.  

As far as that accident we were talking about it more than likely was caused by someone that did not check their blind spot but the speed that they were traveling at  caused the car that got bumped into to roll over 8 times.  Traveling slower that would not have happened.  Everyone here says that speed does not cause any accidents which is false but also when speed is not the cause it makes the accident a lot worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd I either saw that video before or something very close to it.  </p>
<p>As far as that accident we were talking about it more than likely was caused by someone that did not check their blind spot but the speed that they were traveling at  caused the car that got bumped into to roll over 8 times.  Traveling slower that would not have happened.  Everyone here says that speed does not cause any accidents which is false but also when speed is not the cause it makes the accident a lot worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-10371</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 02:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/#comment-10371</guid>
		<description>Randy it seems to me that the driver who caused the 3rd crash did not look in his blind spot before changing lanes. Checking your blind spot once when making a lane change is not enough. I always check my blind spot twice when making a lane change (I first look in my blind spot before I start to move into the lane and a second look in my blind spot as I am moving into my lane). If your driving an average size car it should only take you about 0.5 seconds to take a good look in your blind spot.

I also found a crazy video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4j3w1QfV35I

Watch the whole video. The crazy part happens after the officer walks back to his car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy it seems to me that the driver who caused the 3rd crash did not look in his blind spot before changing lanes. Checking your blind spot once when making a lane change is not enough. I always check my blind spot twice when making a lane change (I first look in my blind spot before I start to move into the lane and a second look in my blind spot as I am moving into my lane). If your driving an average size car it should only take you about 0.5 seconds to take a good look in your blind spot.</p>
<p>I also found a crazy video at <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4j3w1QfV35I" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4j3w1QfV35I</a></p>
<p>Watch the whole video. The crazy part happens after the officer walks back to his car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwin L. Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-10369</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwin L. Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/technology/is-new-technology-creating-bad-drivers/#comment-10369</guid>
		<description>To Randy &amp; Jeff:

Back in the 90s, because of my son&#039;s karate tournaments, I used to drive my 1985 Pontiac Parisenne up to 40,000 miles per year. Over the life of this car (currently at about 270,000 miles) I would get about 1 speeding ticket every 25,000 miles (about the circumference of the earth). That may not seem like much but over time it adds up. 

I used to think that a good compromise would be to usually set the cruise control at about 5 over and generally stay in the right lane. The problem with that is the right lane would occasionally contain someone going at or below the speed limit. When I would look in my rearview mirror, as often as not would be another car going ever so slightly faster than I. My choice then would be to turn up the wick or brake. 

If the interstate were more like the autobahn we would have a different set of problems although the autobahn has a slightly better safety record and that has to count for something considering that the speeds are much higher. Just as many or perhaps more citations are written on the autobahn but not very much for speeding. As long as you maintain proper lane discipline, don&#039;t follow too closely and don&#039;t give impolite gestures you can get by with driving. 

In the United States, by contrast, speed limits are enforced according to location and time. My last speeding ticket, my 10th and last on the Parisenne, which was in the summer of 2001, was a bogus ticket. Oddly enough it was that one that caused me to become what the National Motorists Association calls an extreme law abider. I became this type of driver because I didn&#039;t want any more speeding tickets. It wasn&#039;t a safety issue. In fact I now consider myself a more dangerous driver than I was before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Randy &amp; Jeff:</p>
<p>Back in the 90s, because of my son&#8217;s karate tournaments, I used to drive my 1985 Pontiac Parisenne up to 40,000 miles per year. Over the life of this car (currently at about 270,000 miles) I would get about 1 speeding ticket every 25,000 miles (about the circumference of the earth). That may not seem like much but over time it adds up. </p>
<p>I used to think that a good compromise would be to usually set the cruise control at about 5 over and generally stay in the right lane. The problem with that is the right lane would occasionally contain someone going at or below the speed limit. When I would look in my rearview mirror, as often as not would be another car going ever so slightly faster than I. My choice then would be to turn up the wick or brake. </p>
<p>If the interstate were more like the autobahn we would have a different set of problems although the autobahn has a slightly better safety record and that has to count for something considering that the speeds are much higher. Just as many or perhaps more citations are written on the autobahn but not very much for speeding. As long as you maintain proper lane discipline, don&#8217;t follow too closely and don&#8217;t give impolite gestures you can get by with driving. </p>
<p>In the United States, by contrast, speed limits are enforced according to location and time. My last speeding ticket, my 10th and last on the Parisenne, which was in the summer of 2001, was a bogus ticket. Oddly enough it was that one that caused me to become what the National Motorists Association calls an extreme law abider. I became this type of driver because I didn&#8217;t want any more speeding tickets. It wasn&#8217;t a safety issue. In fact I now consider myself a more dangerous driver than I was before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
