<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gas Saving Myths And Truths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.motorists.org/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.motorists.org/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/</link>
	<description>News For Drivers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:16:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sodbuster</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-13188</link>
		<dc:creator>Sodbuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/#comment-13188</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s been a lot of talk about using water with gas to get better mileage. How about an article on this subject. Is this a hoax, scam or what????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of talk about using water with gas to get better mileage. How about an article on this subject. Is this a hoax, scam or what????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Mckrackin</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-13057</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Mckrackin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/#comment-13057</guid>
		<description>The 09 Dodge Ram has a 5 speed automatic transmission. And the cruise control does give the best gas mileage when you set it at the right number</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 09 Dodge Ram has a 5 speed automatic transmission. And the cruise control does give the best gas mileage when you set it at the right number</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-12850</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/#comment-12850</guid>
		<description>Chrysler was working on a 7 speed double clutch transmission for the Ram.
http://www.allpar.com/corporate/auto-manual-transmission.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrysler was working on a 7 speed double clutch transmission for the Ram.<br />
<a href="http://www.allpar.com/corporate/auto-manual-transmission.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.allpar.com/corporate/auto-manual-transmission.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TONY RICH</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-12839</link>
		<dc:creator>TONY RICH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/#comment-12839</guid>
		<description>I have found that the biggest fuel saver is to use the cruise control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have found that the biggest fuel saver is to use the cruise control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-12837</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/#comment-12837</guid>
		<description>The Dodge Ram does not have a 7 speed transmission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dodge Ram does not have a 7 speed transmission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-12832</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/#comment-12832</guid>
		<description>All torque converters have lockup. The last one that didn&#039;t have lockup was the Geo Metro 3 cylinder 3 speed, like a decade ago.
Many lockup during acceleration, (MB 7 speed, ZF 6 speed autos, Aisin 6/8 speed auto, JATCO 7 speed) there is no sense having the torque converter unlocked when you are above the engine&#039;s peak torque.
They also have a feature called continuous slip where they nearly lockup at low loadings (like city driving) for better mileage. (the slip is to isolate the lugging feeling) Chrylser calls theirs EMCC, GM ECCC, etc, etc.
In the real world, automatics usually get better mileage than stick shifts, but it depends on the skill/experience of the driver and the usage (pure city to pure highway)

The CVT&#039;s with torque converters (Nissan) usually lockup at low vehicle speeds, above 5 mph to about 10mph.

VW&#039;s double clutch transmission doesn&#039;t &#039;theoretically&#039; outdo manual transmissions, it actually delivers better performance &amp; mileage.  They documented that that when it was introduced. That is why Chrysler was putting many eggs in the double clutch transmission basket (7 speed for the Dodge Ram)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All torque converters have lockup. The last one that didn&#8217;t have lockup was the Geo Metro 3 cylinder 3 speed, like a decade ago.<br />
Many lockup during acceleration, (MB 7 speed, ZF 6 speed autos, Aisin 6/8 speed auto, JATCO 7 speed) there is no sense having the torque converter unlocked when you are above the engine&#8217;s peak torque.<br />
They also have a feature called continuous slip where they nearly lockup at low loadings (like city driving) for better mileage. (the slip is to isolate the lugging feeling) Chrylser calls theirs EMCC, GM ECCC, etc, etc.<br />
In the real world, automatics usually get better mileage than stick shifts, but it depends on the skill/experience of the driver and the usage (pure city to pure highway)</p>
<p>The CVT&#8217;s with torque converters (Nissan) usually lockup at low vehicle speeds, above 5 mph to about 10mph.</p>
<p>VW&#8217;s double clutch transmission doesn&#8217;t &#8216;theoretically&#8217; outdo manual transmissions, it actually delivers better performance &amp; mileage.  They documented that that when it was introduced. That is why Chrysler was putting many eggs in the double clutch transmission basket (7 speed for the Dodge Ram)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CW</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-12816</link>
		<dc:creator>CW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/#comment-12816</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but that bit about automatic vs. manual is simply not true, and the reason automatics are not as efficient is inherent in the design.  It doesn&#039;t matter how many forward gears you stuff in there, it still has a fluid drive - AKA the torque converter - which soaks up energy like a sponge, resulting in reduced fuel economy.  Some have &quot;lock-up&quot; torque converters, but these are not enabled while accelerating.  Basically, you&#039;re not using the lock-up feature very much in town, and that&#039;s where most Americans do most of their driving.

Transmissions like the VW &quot;DSG&quot; transmission - a true direct-drive manual transmission (with two automated clutches that are otherwise conventional) that shifts automatically - could theoretically outdo a conventional manual transmission in fuel economy, but a conventional automatic with a torque converter never will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but that bit about automatic vs. manual is simply not true, and the reason automatics are not as efficient is inherent in the design.  It doesn&#8217;t matter how many forward gears you stuff in there, it still has a fluid drive &#8211; AKA the torque converter &#8211; which soaks up energy like a sponge, resulting in reduced fuel economy.  Some have &#8220;lock-up&#8221; torque converters, but these are not enabled while accelerating.  Basically, you&#8217;re not using the lock-up feature very much in town, and that&#8217;s where most Americans do most of their driving.</p>
<p>Transmissions like the VW &#8220;DSG&#8221; transmission &#8211; a true direct-drive manual transmission (with two automated clutches that are otherwise conventional) that shifts automatically &#8211; could theoretically outdo a conventional manual transmission in fuel economy, but a conventional automatic with a torque converter never will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-12796</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/#comment-12796</guid>
		<description>The point of a manumatic interface is versatility.
If you don&#039;t want to actively drive, just leave it in D-can do that with a stick shift?
When you don&#039;t want to delegate responsibility, you move the transmission selector to the manumatic gate.

Unmaintained older automatic transmission can have more latency due to an old transmission filter, and more clutch pack wear requiring more fluid to actuate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point of a manumatic interface is versatility.<br />
If you don&#8217;t want to actively drive, just leave it in D-can do that with a stick shift?<br />
When you don&#8217;t want to delegate responsibility, you move the transmission selector to the manumatic gate.</p>
<p>Unmaintained older automatic transmission can have more latency due to an old transmission filter, and more clutch pack wear requiring more fluid to actuate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-12760</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/#comment-12760</guid>
		<description>What is the point of a manumatic?  Either get a manual transmission, or let the automatic do what it&#039;s supposed to do by itself.

Automatics tend to have slower response as the get older.  And they are far more expensive to rebuild than replacing a clutch on a manual trans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the point of a manumatic?  Either get a manual transmission, or let the automatic do what it&#8217;s supposed to do by itself.</p>
<p>Automatics tend to have slower response as the get older.  And they are far more expensive to rebuild than replacing a clutch on a manual trans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall</title>
		<link>http://blog.motorists.org/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-12733</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motorists.org/blog/gas-saving-myths-and-truths/#comment-12733</guid>
		<description>i agree with george i gotta a 99 solara and i never have a problem passing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with george i gotta a 99 solara and i never have a problem passing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
