Fight Speeding Ticket


National Motorists Association Blog



Flashing Third Eye

Posted on October 8th, 2012 in , , | 6 Comments

Flashing Third Eye
By Eric Peters, Automotive Columnist

My pal Dom alerted me to a new annoyance — inevitably touted (and likely, soon to be mandated) as a “safety” measure: Third brake lights that flash or blink instead of merely illuminating, along with the main brake lights. He posted a video of this phenomenon over at Clover Cam, in case you’re interested in seeing this latest example of “safety” technology that arguably is going to make the roads a lot less safe.

How so?

Visual clutter. Too much input to process — so instead of being noticed, the input is ignored.

An example: Those of a certain vintage will remember the world before always-on headlights — Daytime Running Lamps, or DRL’s — came into play. Back then, you could easily pick out a funeral procession or emergency vehicle — because they were the only vehicles that operated in the daytime with their lights on. They and motorcycles — which were as a result also easier to notice — which made things safer for them and everyone else.

Of course, in those dread dark days of yore, people were also expected to pay attention — which today is apparently too much to expect.

Thus, today, it is much harder — impossible, even — to identify which cars are lined up in a funeral procession even when one is paying attention, because every car — well, almost every car — has its headlights on despite it being broad daylight.

Motorcycles are invisible — easily lost in the glare of all those always-on headlights.

Ironic, isn’t it?

DRL’s were sold as a way to make cars more visible. In practice, having everyone running around with their lights on has only made individual cars (and all motorcycles) less visible, increased visual clutter and made the driving environment more chaotic.

Which is exactly what will happen when the no-goodniks in DC decide to mandate the blinking third eye. They haven’t yet — but rest assured, it’s coming. A political Clover loves nothing more than “safety” — whether actually safe or not. We got saddled with third-eye brake lights (CHMSL’s) this way, too. Bet on blinking CHMSL’s in the near future.

Then, imagine being in a pack of cars, in heavy traffic — with literally dozens of blinking, flashing brake lights assaulting your optic nerve and overwhelming your brains’ ability to process.

There is a reason why cop cars and emergency vehicles use flashing lights: They are disorienting to the driver being pulled over. Which is, you know, the opposite of what you’d like when it comes to encouraging a driver trying to maintain his focus on the task at hand.

The flaw — the fly in the pie — is the same as with DRL’s. If you have a single car coming down an empty road, it will indeed be more visible — and sooner — if it is running with its lights on. The problem is that America is no longer a land of single cars toodling down empty (or even mostly empty) roads. One car with its lights on is easy to pick out. One car with its headlights on in a sea of cars with their headlights on is invisible. Worse than that, actually. Because DRL’s create glare — a problem that was nonexistent before DRL’s were force-fed to the American driver. (General Motors is the guilty party here. Because DRL’s are required by law in Canada — and because GM sells a lot of cars in Canada — GM figured it would be cheaper to build all its cars with DRL’s … rather than build cars with DRL’s for Canada and cars without them for the US. That’s how — and why — we got saddled with DRL’s — which GM touted as a “safety” feature. Other automakers followed suit.)

Well, the same problem applies to these flashing, blinking brake lights.

Will a single car with this feature stick out more — be more immediately noticeable? Certainly. But that temporary advantage will disappear when all — or most — cars out there have flashing, blinking third brake lights. The human brain learns to cancel out such visual white noise. Ask anyone who lives in say Times Square, NY. Flashing lights just become another part of the background mosaic. When flashing lights are everywhere, you stop paying attention to them. You have to — otherwise you’d be overwhelmed by the excessive input.

So, there’s that.

There’s also the issue of the distraction they’ll create. Look at the pretty flashing lights!…. forget all all about braking.

Crunch.

Or, it’ll be more benign — if adding to the addlement (a neologism!) of the American Driver is to be looked upon as benign. Stare at the pretty flashing red lights… oops, didn’t notice the red light up ahead just turned green.

Electronic stupefication proceeds apace.

It’s not enough, apparently, to have people with sail fawns glued to their ears at all times, hooked up to their Bluetooth IVs, dependent on “smart” cruise control to notice they’re about to rear-end the car up ahead and slow the car for them, automatically… insufficient, to expect them to keep their vehicle from wandering over the double yellow (or off the road entirely) and so, we must have Lane Departure buzzers and lights. Too much, you see, to expect them to crane their necks and visually confirm with their eyes that no tot lies asleep underneath the back tires before engaging reverse — and so, mandatory back-up cameras… .

Impossible, to check and maintain the prescribed psi in their tires; electric monitors for everyone!

And so on. And soon, probably — pretty flashing “third eye” brake lights, too.

Why not strobe lights on the roof, for that matter?

Saaaaaaafety!

Comments?

www.epautos.com


Not an NMA member yet?   Join today and get these great benefits!

Leave a Comment

6 Responses to “Flashing Third Eye”

  1. John says:

    I don’t understand the argument against DRLs. Too many drivers ignore the fact that it’s early morning and the sun hasn’t fully come up; it’s pissing rain and you can’t see cars coming at you; it’s dusk and people continue to drive their dark colored cars not realizing they can’t be seen. DRLs (even though there are no tail lights) are valuable during those times when cars can barely be seen.

    More than that, I don’t understand why people drive on clear nights (no rain, no fog, no clouds) with their fog lamps on. They are annoying and bright especially when they are not properly aimed and when they are on a truck which is naturally higher than a car, they are ridiculously annoying. Do people realize they are meant for fog and are not there as a fashion accessory? Do they realize that fog lamps, aimed properly, only light the immediate area in front of the vehicle to a distance of about 5 feet?

    And to the luxury car owners out there. Don’t your cars have an auto on feature? My Audi does. Going through a dark tunnel, they snap on. At dusk or dawn they’re on. Going into a garage they go on (why do people drive in low light or no light garages without lights?).

    I’m guessing that most Audis, Mercedes, BMWs etc have this feature. So why don’t I see the lights going on? You don’t know that this feature exists (you never read the owner’s manual?)?

  2. RepealTheVaRadarDetectorBan says:

    One of the problems I have with the DRL’s is the “High Beam” DRL’s. I have seen some that were so bright that on a bright sunny day, they were blinding. DRL’s have no “Safety” affect that I have seen.

  3. George_C says:

    Just required that all CHMSL reach maximum output in 100ms.
    That means incandescent filament bulbs will be out, they require 200-250ms.
    So LEDs will be the standard for the CHMSL. That will be a safety improvement. (assuming the auto makers are dumb enough to forget to put extra defrost wires around the area of the glass where the light exits)

  4. Evan says:

    Another more dangerous side effect of DRL’s that I’ve noticed a lot lately is people driving at night without their lights on. Between the amount of light the DRL’s put out and the instrument panels that in many cars are now lighted day or night, these clueless folks driving without taillights are more dangerous than any supposed safety issue the DRL’s were addressing in the first place!

    • John says:

      I agree. People are clueless when it comes to this. I think part of it is that dashboards aren’t dark so when you’re driving you don’t realize the lights aren’t on because the dash is well lit. It can’t be that more expensive to have every car equipped with an auto-on feature. It wasn’t that long ago that electric windows was a luxury item. Now the cheapest car out there has power windows. Why not have the auto-on feature too?

  5. David says:

    I recall magazine articles promoting accelerometer triggered, progressive, extra brake lights in a bar. I could see moving the third light higher — but it is silly for cars where the ether two lights are already high, like my Honda CR-V!




Join National Motorists Association

© National Motorists Association