Fight Speeding Ticket


National Motorists Association Blog



Due Process Is A Right, Right?

Posted on April 13th, 2010 in , | 7 Comments

Due Process Is A Right, Right?
By James Baxter, NMA President

Fighting a traffic ticket isn’t fun, at least for most people. You’re playing in an arena where the other side has the home field advantage, makes all the rules, owns the referees, and virtually operates without meaningful oversight. No wonder only a tiny percentage of ticket recipients seriously set out to challenge the charges lodged against them. Still, the justice system’s hackles are up and it senses the need to protect its prerogatives (and its cash flow).

Despite the small cadre of often ill equipped, poorly prepared, and over-matched traffic ticket defendants, the courts feel threatened and they are fighting back.

Traditionally the courts have relied on obscure rules, byzantine procedures, inconsistency from court to court and system to system, deliberately unhelpful employees, and insider collusion to keep the riff raff at bay. Not good enough anymore; the unwashed masses, in the form of pro-se defendants, keep cluttering up the courtrooms and threatening the vacation plans of the “keepers of the law.” The new weapon of choice; price the slugs out of the system. Make it too expensive for the average person to even consider fighting a ticket, and woe be to thee who loses his or her challenge.

Individual judges have employed economic roadblocks and confiscatory penalties for years, but the practice wasn’t systematic. That’s beginning to change.

Massachusetts started the ball rolling on a grand scale by charging every traffic ticket defendant $25, non refundable, regardless of guilt or innocence, just to get a hearing in front of a dubiously qualified judge. Upon failing at that level and desiring a more legitimate trial, with some semblence of rules, the erstwhile defendant must cough up another $50, again, non refundable, for his date in court.

Just recently, the Indiana Legislature, under the guise of corraling a rogue judge who was slapping major fines on defendants because they had the audacity to use up his valuable time, passed a law that systematically increases the fines of ticket defendants who make a point of challenging the traffic ticket industry in court. These people are the thin line that keep the system half way honest and the legislature (with courthouse boosters) has decided to throttle them with additional fines in excess of $500! Just watch this trend grow.

The passing of hundreds of arcane traffic laws every year, increasing fines to the point that they are challenging car and mortgage payments, making police officers revenue generators, and “Public Private Partnerships” like the combination of local governments and ticket camera merchants are creating a growing mass of otherwise passive and apathetic citizens who want to resist the egregious use of the police power to steal their money. Where do they think they can get relief? The courts! Fat chance that. But hope springs eternal.

Voting is a right. Many decades ago governments used poll taxes to price minorities out of the voting booth. These people were being denied their right to vote through the government sanctioned use of financial penalties. They weren’t called that but that was what they were. The courts eventually admitted the obvious and prohibited this practice.

Due process is a right. Currently the government uses fees, penalties, fines, and a host of non-financial strategies to deny due process to the average citizen who wants to challenge a traffic ticket. The techniques are not always overt, but they serve the purpose of discouraging, if not making it impossible to fight a ticket. But here’s the rub, unlike the poll tax, traffic ticket revenue is the mothers milk of state and local court systems. Will they ever willingly pull free of the traffic ticket teat? I fear not.


Not an NMA member yet?   Join today and get these great benefits!
Speed Limits

You deserve every speeding ticket you get. You can complain all you want after the fact, but it's true. Find out why.

It's one of the "great" American past times: complaining about unfair speeding tickets. There are two types of people when it comes to complaining about this particular type of traffic ticket. Which group are you in?

Leave a Comment

7 Responses to “Due Process Is A Right, Right?”

  1. Lori says:

    Here is a very detailed documentation of my experience.

    http://onecheesecakelater.blogspot.com/2011/04/dr…

  2. Randall1000 says:

    These court fees almost sound unconstitutional. Wouldn't surprise me if it was. In the state of MD this year the legislature passed a law that will probably be signed that said you no longer automatically get a court date. You now have to request one. This is to save money. Sounds like a good idea, but I'm really left wondering how this is going to impact how traffic court is ran.

  3. Guadalautern says:

    It's articles like this which make me thankful I live in the Land(s) of The Free instead of the United States. Whether it is by law or the laissez-faire attitude of the people regarding their laws, I am protected from the bend-over-and-take-it-without-a-kiss trash which is increasingly destroying the Quality of Life in the USA.

    • Randy100 says:

      Guadalautern we are glad you are not here also. Anyone that brags that they do 110 mph in light rain we do not need or want. I guess Germany does not prosecute their laws that they have?
      In Mexico you do not need the government. The high powered guns rule.

    • GeorgeC_ says:

      They make a tire for high speed operation in the rain. http://www.tirerack.com/tires/BigPic.jsp?sidewall…

      When the McLaren F1 was being developed, Gordon Murray wanted to be able to drive 150mph in a light mist. So there is a mode whereby the rear spoiler is partially extended to 30 degrees, enhancing downforce & stability.

      So why are you complaining about a measly 110?

  4. srd275 says:

    IT is about time people get their due procees rights back.

    I am sure I will be attacked by our resident anti motorists, but our countries judical system was founded on INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. Not pay up, if you dare to challange us WE CHARGE YOU MORE.

    The reality is people are starting to get fed up with the status quo when it comes to photo enforcement. 6 towns have active pettition drives to ban them.

    So there is hope yet.

  5. Randy100 says:

    Sounds good to me. NMA is losing their most favorite way of avoiding tickets. Hoping the cop does not show up to testify. They know if he does they will owe the ticket money because in fact 99.99% of them were guilty in the first place. That is anoher reason why they do not like ticket cameras. Any cop can testify.




Join National Motorists Association

© National Motorists Association